Difference Between Tcp and Udp
The main difference between Tcp and Udp is that Tcp guarantees reliable, ordered delivery of data, while Udp does not. Tcp is a connection-oriented protocol that establishes a session and retransmits lost packets, while Udp is a connectionless protocol that sends packets with no delivery confirmation.
Key takeaways
- Core distinction: TCP guarantees reliable, ordered delivery, while UDP offers fast, connectionless transmission without guarantees.
- How each works: TCP establishes a handshake and tracks packets, whereas UDP sends datagrams immediately with no acknowledgment.
- Cost and performance: TCP adds overhead with headers and retransmissions, making it slower; UDP is lightweight and lower latency.
- Best-fit use case: TCP suits web browsing, email, and file transfer; UDP fits live streaming, VoIP, and gaming.
- Common decision mistake: Choosing TCP for real-time applications causes lag; picking UDP for critical data risks silent packet loss.
Table of Contents18 sections
Difference Between Tcp and Udp: Comparison Table
| Aspect | Tcp | Udp |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Transmission Control Protocol, a connection-oriented transport protocol defined in RFC 9293. | User Datagram Protocol, a connectionless transport protocol defined in RFC 768. |
| Purpose | Delivers reliable, ordered, error-checked data between applications across an IP network. | Delivers fast, best-effort datagrams without guarantees of delivery, order, or integrity. |
| Core Mechanism | Establishes a session via a three-way handshake before any payload data is transmitted. | Sends each datagram independently with no handshake, no session, and no connection state. |
| Connection State | Maintains full connection state on both sender and receiver for the entire session duration. | Keeps no connection state; each datagram is treated as a standalone, unrelated packet. |
| Header Size | Minimum 20 bytes, up to 60 bytes with options, carrying sequence and acknowledgment numbers. | Fixed 8-byte header with only source port, destination port, length, and checksum fields. |
| Data Stream | Treats data as a continuous byte stream with no message boundaries preserved across packets. | Preserves message boundaries; each datagram arrives as a complete, self-contained unit. |
| Sequencing | Assigns sequence numbers to every byte so the receiver can reassemble data in exact order. | Provides no sequence numbers; datagrams can arrive in any order or not arrive at all. |
| Error Checking | Verifies checksum on every segment and retransmits any segment corrupted or lost in transit. | Verifies a single checksum per datagram but discards corrupted packets without recovery. |
| Retransmission | Retransmits lost segments automatically using timers and duplicate acknowledgment triggers. | Never retransmits; lost datagrams are simply gone and the application must handle absence. |
| Acknowledgment | Requires explicit acknowledgments from the receiver to confirm successful segment delivery. | Sends no acknowledgments; the sender has zero confirmation that any datagram was received. |
| Flow Control | Uses a sliding window to prevent the sender from overwhelming a slower receiver's buffer. | Has no flow control; a fast sender can drop packets at a slow receiver's queue. |
| Congestion Control | Adjusts sending rate via algorithms like slow start and congestion avoidance to prevent network collapse. | Has no congestion control; it continues sending at the same rate regardless of network load. |
| Speed | Slower per byte due to handshake overhead, acknowledgments, and retransmission processing. | Faster per packet because there is no handshake, no acknowledgment wait, and minimal overhead. |
| Latency | Higher initial latency from the three-way handshake before the first payload byte is sent. | Lower latency; the first datagram is sent immediately with no setup delay whatsoever. |
| Overhead | Higher per-segment overhead from larger headers plus acknowledgment traffic on the return path. | Minimal overhead; only the 8-byte header and no return acknowledgment traffic exists. |
| Bandwidth Use | Consumes extra bandwidth for handshakes, acknowledgments, retransmissions, and window updates. | Uses bandwidth only for actual payload plus 8 header bytes, making it more bandwidth-efficient. |
| Reliability | Guarantees delivery, order, and integrity through retransmission and acknowledgment mechanisms. | Provides best-effort delivery only; packets may be lost, duplicated, or corrupted silently. |
| Duplication | Detects and discards duplicate segments using sequence numbers and a deduplication mechanism. | Can deliver duplicate datagrams; the receiver has no way to identify or filter duplicates. |
| Data Integrity | Ensures complete, uncorrupted data delivery by retransmitting any segment that fails checksum. | Detects corruption via checksum but drops the datagram instead of repairing or retrying it. |
| Durability | Survives network congestion gracefully by slowing transmission rather than dropping application data. | Drops datagrams under congestion without warning, making it unsuitable for critical data. |
| Scalability | Scales poorly for massive concurrent connections due to per-connection state and memory overhead. | Scales extremely well because stateless servers handle millions of clients with minimal resources. |
| Multicasting | Supports only unicast communication between a single sender and a single receiver pair. | Supports unicast, broadcast, and multicast, enabling one-to-many and many-to-many delivery. |
| Broadcasting | Cannot broadcast; every TCP connection is strictly point-to-point between two endpoints. | Can broadcast to all hosts on a subnet, useful for discovery and local network protocols. |
| Security | Harder to spoof because sequence numbers and session state make packet injection more difficult. | Easier to spoof and inject because there is no handshake, sequence tracking, or session validation. |
| Firewall Behavior | Firewalls track connection state and allow return traffic only for established TCP sessions. | Firewalls treat each datagram independently, often requiring explicit rules for UDP ports. |
| Compatibility | Supported by virtually every operating system, browser, firewall, and network device globally. | Supported universally but frequently blocked or rate-limited by firewalls and NAT devices. |
| NAT Traversal | Works through NAT reliably because connection tracking maintains bidirectional mapping state. | Fails through NAT unless applications use techniques like STUN, TURN, or UDP hole punching. |
| Common Examples | HTTP/HTTPS web browsing, email (SMTP, IMAP), file transfer (FTP, SFTP), and SSH remote access. | DNS lookups, DHCP, VoIP calls, live video streaming, online gaming, and SNMP monitoring. |
| Typical Users | Chosen by developers building web servers, databases, email systems, and file transfer tools. | Chosen by developers building real-time games, voice/video apps, and streaming platforms. |
| Limitations | Head-of-line blocking delays all data behind a lost packet, and handshake adds setup latency. | No delivery guarantee, no ordering, no congestion control, and no protection against packet loss. |
| Best-Fit Scenario | Best for file transfers, web pages, emails, and any application where accuracy outweighs speed. | Best for live streaming, gaming, VoIP, and any application where speed outweighs perfect accuracy. |
What Is Tcp?
Tcp is a core internet protocol that delivers data reliably between devices. It breaks information into packets, numbers them, and reassembles them in order at the destination. Tcp exists to guarantee complete, accurate communication when data loss is unacceptable.
Definition of Tcp
Tcp, or Transmission Control Protocol, is a connection-oriented transport protocol that establishes a session between hosts. It provides ordered, error-checked delivery of a byte stream across an IP network. Tcp manages acknowledgements, retransmissions, and flow control to ensure reliable end-to-end communication.
Key Characteristics of Tcp
| Characteristic | What It Means in Practice |
|---|---|
| Connection-oriented | Establishes a formal handshake session before any data packets travel between sender and receiver. |
| Reliable delivery | Confirms every packet arrives, and automatically resends any packet that gets lost in transit. |
| Ordered packets | Assigns sequence numbers to data so the receiver can reassemble everything in the correct original order. |
| Error checking | Uses checksums on every segment to detect corruption and discard any damaged data it receives. |
| Flow control | Adjusts transmission speed based on receiver capacity so the sender never overwhelms a slower device. |
| Congestion control | Detects network overload and reduces sending rate to prevent packet loss across busy links. |
| Full duplex | Allows both connected devices to send and receive data simultaneously on the same session. |
| Byte stream | Treats data as a continuous stream of bytes rather than discrete independent messages or datagrams. |
| Acknowledgements | Requires the receiver to send confirmation signals for each batch of data successfully received. |
| Three-way handshake | Uses SYN, SYN-ACK, and ACK signals to synchronise both devices before any payload transfers. |
Common Examples of Tcp
- HTTP/HTTPS web browsing – loads web pages without missing images, scripts, or text content.
- SMTP email sending – delivers mail messages completely and accurately between mail servers.
- FTP file transfer – moves large files with verification that every byte arrives intact.
- SSH remote login – maintains a stable, ordered terminal session for secure server administration.
- MySQL database queries – ensures every row of data arrives correctly for financial transactions.
- Telnet terminal access – provides reliable character-by-character communication with legacy systems.
- POP3/IMAP email retrieval – downloads full message bodies and attachments without truncation.
- RDP remote desktop – streams screen updates reliably so remote sessions stay synchronised.
- SFTP secure transfers – combines SSH encryption with Tcp reliability for safe file uploads.
- BitTorrent control traffic – uses Tcp for tracker communication and peer metadata exchange.
Advantages and Limitations of Tcp
| Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|
| Guarantees every byte arrives exactly as sent, making it safe for critical data. | Slower than connectionless protocols because every packet requires acknowledgement overhead. |
| Handles retransmission automatically, so applications do not need custom error recovery logic. | Higher latency is introduced by the initial three-way handshake before any data transfer begins. |
| Preserves packet order, which is essential for file integrity and streamed content assembly. | Head-of-line blocking delays later packets when one earlier packet is lost and must be resent. |
| Includes built-in congestion control that adapts to network conditions without user intervention. | Larger header size of 20 bytes reduces useful payload compared to lighter protocols. |
| Works universally across the internet with firewalls, NATs, and proxies designed around it. | Not suitable for real-time voice or video where dropped packets are preferable to delays. |
| Provides flow control that prevents fast senders from overwhelming slow or busy receivers. | Connection state consumes memory on both hosts, limiting the number of simultaneous sessions. |
| Delivers a continuous byte stream, simplifying application code for reading and writing data. | No built-in encryption, so sensitive data requires additional TLS or SSH layers for security. |
| Offers reliable teardown that ensures both sides finish transmitting before closing the session. | Vulnerable to SYN flood attacks where incomplete handshakes exhaust server resources. |
| Supported by every major operating system and programming language with mature libraries. | Bandwidth utilisation is inefficient for tiny messages because of per-segment overhead costs. |
| Provides application multiplexing through port numbers so many services run on one host. | Does not support broadcast or multicast delivery, limiting it strictly to one-to-one communication. |
What Is Udp?
Udp, or User Datagram Protocol, is a connectionless transport-layer protocol that sends data packets without establishing a session. It prioritizes speed and low latency over reliability, making it ideal for real-time applications where dropped packets are preferable to delays.
Definition of Udp
Udp is a minimal, message-oriented Internet protocol that provides a best-effort delivery service. It adds only source and destination port numbers, length, and a checksum to the payload. It offers no handshaking, sequencing, retransmission, or congestion control, leaving error recovery entirely to the application layer.
Key Characteristics of Udp
| Characteristic | What It Means in Practice |
|---|---|
| Connectionless | Data sends immediately without a handshake, so no setup delay occurs before transmission. |
| Unreliable delivery | Packets may arrive out of order, duplicated, or not at all, with no automatic retransmission. |
| Low overhead | An 8-byte header keeps packet size small, reducing bandwidth consumption and processing time. |
| No sequencing | Data arrives in any order, and the receiving application must reorder or discard as needed. |
| No flow control | The sender transmits at full speed regardless of receiver capacity, risking buffer overflow. |
| No congestion control | Udp does not slow down when the network is busy, which can worsen network congestion. |
| Stateless operation | Each datagram is independent, so no memory is reserved for connection state on the server. |
| Broadcast support | Udp can send one datagram to every host on a local network segment simultaneously. |
| Multicast support | Udp delivers a single datagram to a defined group of interested receivers efficiently. |
| Checksum optional | In IPv4, the checksum can be disabled in some cases to gain even greater speed. |
Common Examples of Udp
- DNS – Domain Name System lookups use Udp port 53 for fast, single-query responses.
- VoIP – Voice over IP calls use Udp to avoid delays that would cause garbled audio.
- Live streaming – Real-time video broadcasts use Udp to keep playback smooth and current.
- Online gaming – Fast-paced multiplayer games use Udp for rapid player position updates.
- DHCP – Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol uses Udp for IP address assignment requests.
- SNMP – Simple Network Management Protocol uses Udp to monitor network device health.
- TFTP – Trivial File Transfer Protocol uses Udp for simple file transfers on local networks.
- NTP – Network Time Protocol uses Udp to synchronize clocks with minimal latency.
- QUIC – Modern HTTP/3 builds on Udp to reduce connection establishment time for web traffic.
- RTP – Real-time Transport Protocol carries audio and video over Udp in conferencing systems.
Advantages and Limitations of Udp
| Advantages | Limitations |
|---|---|
| Lower latency than Tcp because no connection setup or acknowledgment waits occur. | No guarantee that any packet will ever reach its destination intact. |
| Faster transmission for small messages since the tiny 8-byte header adds minimal overhead. | No retransmission of lost packets, so data loss is permanent and unrecoverable. |
| Supports one-to-many broadcast and multicast, which Tcp cannot provide at all. | No congestion control, so a sender can flood a network and harm other users. |
| Simpler implementation in applications, requiring less code and fewer system resources. | No flow control, so a fast sender can overwhelm a slow receiver with data. |
| Works well for real-time services where fresh data matters more than complete data. | No sequencing, so packets arrive out of order and applications must handle reordering. |
| Stateless servers can handle many more clients because no per-connection memory is used. | No built-in security, leaving datagrams vulnerable to spoofing and injection attacks. |
| No head-of-line blocking, so one lost packet does not delay subsequent packets. | No acknowledgment, so senders never know if their data was actually received. |
| Lower jitter in time-sensitive streams because there are no retransmission pauses. | Firewalls and NATs often treat Udp poorly, causing connectivity problems in practice. |
| Enables fast connectionless queries like DNS that complete in a single round trip. | Applications must build their own reliability, which is complex and error-prone. |
| Ideal for gaming and voice where stale data is useless and speed is the priority. | Udp can amplify denial-of-service attacks through reflection and amplification techniques. |
Similarities Between Tcp and Udp
| Shared Aspect | How Tcp and Udp Are Alike |
|---|---|
| Core Purpose | Tcp and Udp both deliver data packets across IP networks from one device to another. |
| Network Layer | Tcp and Udp both operate at the transport layer of the TCP/IP protocol stack. |
| Data Format | Tcp and Udp both package application data into segments for transmission over the internet. |
| IP Foundation | Tcp and Udp both rely on the Internet Protocol for addressing and routing their packets. |
| Port Numbers | Tcp and Udp both use 16-bit port numbers to identify the destination application. |
| Multiplexing Role | Tcp and Udp both enable multiple applications to share a single network connection simultaneously. |
| End Systems | Tcp and Udp both run on the sending and receiving hosts, not on intermediate routers. |
| Socket Usage | Tcp and Udp both use sockets that combine an IP address with a port number. |
| Checksum Field | Tcp and Udp both include a checksum to detect corruption in the transmitted header. |
| Data Multiplexing | Tcp and Udp both allow multiple processes to send and receive data concurrently. |
| Application Interface | Tcp and Udp both provide a standard API for programmers to send and receive data. |
| Protocol Standards | Tcp and Udp both are defined by the IETF in official RFC documents. |
| Operating Systems | Tcp and Udp both are built into every major operating system including Windows, Linux and macOS. |
| Internet Backbone | Tcp and Udp both carry the majority of all internet traffic in modern networks. |
| Connection Endpoint | Tcp and Udp both require a source and destination IP address to function correctly. |
| Client-Server Model | Tcp and Udp both support the standard client-server architecture used by most network applications. |
| Data Encapsulation | Tcp and Udp both wrap application data with headers before passing it to the network layer. |
| Protocol Stacking | Tcp and Udp both sit above IP and below the application layer in the protocol hierarchy. |
| Firewall Handling | Tcp and Udp both are filtered and managed by network firewalls using port rules. |
| Network Diagnostics | Tcp and Udp both can be monitored using tools like netstat and packet analyzers. |
| Security Exposure | Tcp and Udp both are vulnerable to packet sniffing and require encryption for secure data. |
| Latency Factors | Tcp and Udp both experience network latency influenced by distance and congestion. |
| Bandwidth Usage | Tcp and Udp both consume available bandwidth based on the application's data rate. |
| Packet Loss Risk | Tcp and Udp both face the risk of packet loss when network congestion occurs. |
| Routing Dependency | Tcp and Udp both depend on routers to forward their packets across the network path. |
| Protocol Numbering | Tcp and Udp both are identified by a protocol number in the IP header. |
| Software Libraries | Tcp and Udp both are supported by standard networking libraries in all programming languages. |
| Data Payload | Tcp and Udp both carry application-layer data as their primary payload in each packet. |
| Network Evolution | Tcp and Udp both remain essential despite newer protocols like QUIC and SCTP emerging. |
| Documentation Base | Tcp and Udp both have extensive public documentation and troubleshooting guides available. |
Tcp or Udp: Which Should You Choose?
The single variable that decides it is whether losing a few packets is worse than waiting for them to arrive. Tcp guarantees delivery with retransmission, while Udp prioritizes speed. If you need accuracy, choose Tcp. If you need real-time action, choose Udp.
When to Use Tcp
Choose Tcp when data integrity matters more than latency, such as for web pages, emails, or file transfers. Use it for financial transactions where a single lost packet corrupts the record. Tcp also fits low-bandwidth, high-reliability networks where retransmission costs are acceptable.
When to Use Udp
Choose Udp when speed is critical and minor loss is tolerable, such as live video calls or online gaming. Use it for real-time voice where a delayed packet is useless. Udp also suits broadcast or multicast streaming where sending to many receivers without handshakes is mandatory.
Common Misconceptions About Tcp and Udp
| Common Myth | The Reality |
|---|---|
| TCP is always faster than UDP because it is more reliable. | TCP is slower than UDP because TCP adds handshakes, acknowledgments, and retransmissions that UDP skips entirely. |
| UDP has no error checking at all, so data always arrives corrupted. | UDP includes a basic checksum to detect corruption, but UDP discards bad packets instead of retransmitting them like TCP does. |
| TCP guarantees that every packet you send will arrive at its destination. | TCP guarantees delivery only if the network path stays alive; TCP retransmits lost segments, but TCP cannot deliver data if the connection breaks. |
| UDP is connectionless, which means it cannot track any state between sender and receiver. | UDP is connectionless at the protocol level, but applications using UDP can still maintain their own state and session logic above it. |
| TCP is only used for web browsing, while UDP is only used for gaming. | TCP handles email, file transfer, and web pages, while UDP powers DNS, video calls, live streaming, and online gaming simultaneously. |
| UDP packets always arrive out of order, making UDP useless for ordered data. | UDP preserves order on most local networks, but UDP offers no reordering guarantee, so applications must handle sequence numbers themselves. |
| TCP headers are smaller than UDP headers because TCP is more efficient. | TCP headers are 20-60 bytes, while UDP headers are only 8 bytes, making UDP more efficient for small payloads. |
| Using UDP means your data is completely unprotected from hackers. | UDP lacks TCP's built-in congestion control, but encryption and authentication happen at higher layers like TLS or DTLS for both protocols. |
| TCP is a newer protocol that replaced the older, outdated UDP. | Both TCP and UDP date to the 1980s; UDP remains essential for real-time traffic where TCP's retransmission delays are unacceptable. |
| UDP cannot be used for reliable file transfers because it drops everything. | UDP can transfer files reliably when applications add their own acknowledgment and retransmission logic, as seen in TFTP and QUIC. |
| TCP connections are permanent and never close unless the computer shuts down. | TCP connections close via a four-way handshake or timeout after idle periods, freeing ports for new connections automatically. |
| UDP is faster than TCP because UDP does not check for errors at all. | UDP is faster mainly because UDP avoids connection setup and retransmission delays, not because UDP skips its lightweight checksum check. |
| TCP is a protocol for local networks, while UDP is for the internet. | Both TCP and UDP work identically across LANs and the internet; the choice depends on reliability needs versus latency tolerance. |
| UDP packets are smaller than TCP packets because UDP compresses the data. | UDP adds only 8 header bytes versus TCP's 20+, but UDP does not compress payloads; both carry the same application data size. |
| TCP always delivers data in perfect order, so no application ever needs reordering logic. | TCP reorders segments at the receiver, but applications still buffer data; TCP's ordering guarantee does not eliminate application-level buffering needs. |
| UDP is unreliable, so it should never be used for anything important. | UDP powers critical infrastructure like DNS and DHCP, where a single lost request triggers a quick retry without TCP's overhead. |
| TCP is a single protocol, while UDP is actually a collection of many different protocols. | TCP and UDP are both single transport-layer protocols; the variety you see comes from application protocols like HTTP or RTP that run on top. |
| UDP cannot handle large files because UDP has a maximum packet size limit. | UDP datagrams max out around 65,507 bytes, but applications fragment data across multiple UDP datagrams to transfer files of any size. |
| TCP uses ports, while UDP does not use ports at all. | Both TCP and UDP use 16-bit port numbers to identify applications; TCP and UDP ports are separate namespaces but function identically. |
| UDP is always less secure than TCP because UDP has no sequence numbers. | UDP's lack of sequence numbers makes spoofing easier, but both protocols lack built-in encryption; security comes from IPsec or TLS layers. |
| TCP is a connection-oriented protocol, meaning TCP physically wires two computers together. | TCP creates a logical connection via handshakes and state tracking, not a physical circuit; the underlying network remains packet-switched. |
| UDP is perfect for video calls because UDP never loses any video frames. | UDP drops frames under congestion to avoid delay; video apps use UDP plus error concealment to hide occasional lost frames gracefully. |
| TCP is only used by servers, while UDP is only used by client computers. | Both TCP and UDP run on every device; servers and clients use both protocols depending on the application, not on their role. |
| UDP does not support multicasting, but TCP does support sending to many receivers. | UDP supports multicasting and broadcasting natively, while TCP is strictly point-to-point and cannot send one stream to multiple receivers. |
| TCP is a protocol for text data, while UDP is a protocol for binary data. | Both TCP and UDP carry any binary or text payload; the protocol choice depends on latency and reliability needs, not on data type. |
| UDP is simpler than TCP, so UDP is always the better choice for beginners. | UDP is simpler to implement, but UDP shifts reliability, ordering, and congestion control onto the application, making real-world UDP harder. |
| TCP guarantees that data arrives exactly as sent, with no changes whatsoever. | TCP guarantees delivery and order, but TCP does not protect against bit flips undetected by checksums; corruption can still slip through rarely. |
| UDP has no congestion control, so UDP always floods the network with data. | UDP lacks built-in congestion control, but well-designed UDP applications implement pacing or rely on application-layer rate limits. |
| TCP is a protocol for reliable data, while UDP is a protocol for unreliable data. | TCP provides reliability mechanisms, while UDP provides a minimal transport; neither protocol is inherently "reliable" or "unreliable" by design. |
| Switching from TCP to UDP will automatically make any application faster. | Switching to UDP removes retransmission delays, but UDP adds application complexity; speed gains only appear if the app tolerates packet loss. |
Conclusion
Difference Between Tcp and Udp comes down to reliability versus speed. Tcp guarantees ordered, error-checked delivery with retransmission, making it ideal for files, web pages, and email. Udp prioritizes low latency with no guarantees, suiting live video, gaming, and voice. Choose Tcp when accuracy matters; choose Udp when speed matters.
FAQs on Difference Between Tcp and Udp
- What is the main difference between TCP and UDP?
- TCP is a connection-oriented protocol that guarantees reliable, ordered data delivery, while UDP is connectionless and prioritizes speed over reliability, making TCP the accurate answer for dependable transfers.
- Which is faster, TCP or UDP?
- UDP is faster because it skips the handshake, acknowledgments, and retransmission processes that TCP uses, which adds latency but ensures every packet arrives intact.
- Is TCP more secure than UDP?
- TCP is not inherently more secure than UDP, but its connection state and sequencing make it harder for attackers to inject spoofed packets into an established session.
- Which protocol should I use for live video streaming, TCP or UDP?
- Use UDP for live video streaming because its low latency and tolerance for packet loss prevent the buffering delays that TCP's retransmissions would cause during real-time broadcasts.
- Can I use TCP instead of UDP for gaming?
- You can use TCP for gaming, but it is not recommended because TCP's guaranteed delivery causes lag spikes when packets are lost, whereas UDP lets the game continue with missing data.
- Why does TCP require a three-way handshake but UDP does not?
- TCP requires a three-way handshake to establish a reliable connection and synchronize sequence numbers, while UDP skips it because it simply sends datagrams without needing to confirm the receiver is ready.
- What is a common beginner mistake when choosing between TCP and UDP?
- A common beginner mistake is choosing TCP for everything because it is reliable, without realizing that this reliability adds unnecessary overhead and latency for applications like VoIP that need speed.
- Are TCP and UDP interchangeable for all network applications?
- TCP and UDP are not interchangeable because TCP suits file transfers and web pages that require accuracy, while UDP suits DNS queries and streaming that can tolerate some data loss for speed.
- What happens to my data if a packet is lost during UDP transmission?
- If a packet is lost during UDP transmission, the data is simply discarded and never retransmitted, leaving the receiving application to handle the gap or ignore the missing information.
- Can I switch my application from UDP to TCP without changing the code?
- You cannot switch from UDP to TCP without changing the code because the socket APIs, connection setup, and data handling logic are fundamentally different for each protocol.
- Difference Between Ein and Tin
- Difference Between Private Schools and Public Schools
- Difference Between Hybrid and Sativa
- Difference Between Millennials and Gen Z
- Difference Between Physical Change and Chemical Change
- Difference Between Finance and Accounting
- Difference Between Yoga and Pilates
- Difference Between Pex a and Pex B
- Difference Between Ruby and Garnet
- Difference Between Impact Driver and Drill
- Difference Between Circumcised and Uncircumcised
- Difference Between Bleached Flour and Unbleached Flour
- Difference Between Enhanced Id and Real Id
- Difference Between Humidifier and Diffuser
- Difference Between Money Order and Cashier Check
- Difference Between Tuxedo and Suit